What was a major consequence of the Boston Tea Party answers com?

Lera Tippets asked, updated on May 24th, 2021; Topic: boston tea party
πŸ‘ 314 πŸ‘ 31 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†4.4

Answer and Explanation: A major consequence of the Boston Tea Party was the Coercive Acts passed in 1774, called the Intolerable Acts by Americans.

Follow this link for full answer

Besides this, what was the result of the Boston Tea Party quizlet?

The Tea Act (1773), passed by the British Parliament, withdrew duty on tea exported to the colonies. They thought that the tea would put all of the colonists out of buisness. The effect of the Boston Tea Party was that the British passed the Intolerable acts, which were very harsh and cruel to the people of Boston.

Notwithstanding, what was the main purpose of the Boston Tea Party? The midnight raid, popularly known as the β€œBoston Tea Party,” was in protest of the British Parliament's Tea Act of 1773, a bill designed to save the faltering East India Company by greatly lowering its tea tax and granting it a virtual monopoly on the American tea trade.

Also, how did the Boston Massacre lead to the American Revolution?

The event in Boston helped to unite the colonies against Britain. What started as a minor fight became a turning point in the beginnings of the American Revolution. The Boston Massacre helped spark the colonists' desire for American independence, while the dead rioters became martyrs for liberty.

How did the Boston Massacre lead to the Boston Tea Party?

The Boston Tea Party and the Boston Massacre were two events that inspired the American Revolution, which later led to the independence of the thirteen colonies. Decem, nine o'clock at night. ... In 1773, Parliament passed another tea act. This was one was to help the East India Company specifically.

8 Related Questions Answered

What were the causes and results of the Boston Tea Party?

Now people in all 13 colonies were angry. The cause of the Boston Tea Party was the colonists didn't want taxed tea. The effect was the Sons of Liberty dressed up as Mohawk Indians and dumped all the tea of three ships when they brought a new supply to the colonists.

Why did the colonists choose to throw British tea in Boston Harbor?

Explanation: American colonists in 1770 considered themselves to be loyal Englishmen. Hence they thought they should be treated even handedly, in this case, tea was not taxed in England and they thought it should not be taxed in America. They dumped the tea from 3 ships into the Harbor with a value of about $1 million.

Is there still tea in the Boston Harbor?

In short not likely. The area where the ships were has been filled in as part of the radical changes in the Boston coast since 1773. ... To start the ships the crowd descended on are said to have been tied up to 'Griffins' Wharf.

What was the tax rate that caused the Boston Tea Party?

The act granted the EIC a monopoly on the sale of tea that was cheaper than smuggled tea; its hidden purpose was to force the colonists to pay a tax of 3 pennies on every pound of tea.

What are some important facts about the Boston Tea Party?

7 Surprising Facts About the Boston Tea Party
  • Colonists weren't protesting a higher tax on tea. ...
  • The attacked ships were American and the tea wasn't the King's. ...
  • The tea was Chinese, not Indian, and lots of it was green. ...
  • The Tea Party, itself, didn't incite revolution. ...
  • Yes, Tea Party protestors dressed as 'indians,' but not convincingly.

Who was at fault for the Boston Massacre?

9e. The Boston Massacre. Crispus Attucks was not only the first African American to die for the revolution, he was one of the first patriots to give his life for the cause.

What was the most significant outcome of the Boston Massacre?

What was the most significant outcome of the Boston Massacre? It demonstrated to the colonists that British troops would resort to violence and restore order in the colonies.

How did the Boston Massacre end?

Eight soldiers, one officer, and four civilians were arrested and charged with murder, and they were defended by future U.S. President John Adams. Six of the soldiers were acquitted; the other two were convicted of manslaughter and given reduced sentences.